Ir al contenido principal / Skip to main content
ANALYSIS V3ScheduledData 89% complete

St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Dodgers

Tuesday, September 1, 2026 at 10:10 PM · UNIQLO Field at Dodger Stadium

Main prediction

Los Angeles Dodgers Moneyline

Alternative: First 5 innings winner: St. Louis Cardinals

Model confidence

69.0%

Market probability

64.0%

Observed odds

-187

Data available

89%

Confidence summarizes the strength of the available signals; it is not a guaranteed probability and is not used to calculate an edge against the market. Market probability appears only when enough odds are available.

Context

Projected total
8.9
Reference line
9.0
Line source
Market
First 5 projection
4.7
First 5 line
5.0
Weather
Pending
Temperature
Pending
Wind
Pending
Reference sportsbook
DraftKings

Verifiable comparison

The numbers behind the analysis

You do not need to know sabermetrics: each indicator explains what it measures and whether higher or lower is generally better. Color highlights the stronger figure in that comparison; it does not guarantee the result.

MetricSt. Louis CardinalsLos Angeles Dodgers
Season recordMLB Stats API68-7082-55

Wins and losses accumulated this season. The numerical advantage here belongs to Los Angeles Dodgers.

Last 10 gamesMLB Stats API3-76-4

Recent record: wins and losses over the last ten games. The numerical advantage here belongs to Los Angeles Dodgers.

Starter ERAMLB Stats API3.864.78

Earned runs allowed per nine innings. Lower is generally better. The numerical advantage here belongs to St. Louis Cardinals.

Starter WHIPMLB Stats API1.251.26

Baserunners allowed per inning. Lower generally indicates better control. The numerical advantage here belongs to St. Louis Cardinals.

Offensive OPSMLB Stats API0.6960.757

Combines on-base ability and power. Higher is generally better. The numerical advantage here belongs to Los Angeles Dodgers.

OPS vs starter handednessMLB Stats API · statSplits0.7170.757

Measures each offense against pitchers matching today's starter handedness. The numerical advantage here belongs to Los Angeles Dodgers.

Bullpen ERAMLB Stats API · relevistas4.394.03

Relief-pitcher performance only; a lower figure is generally better. The numerical advantage here belongs to Los Angeles Dodgers.

Supporting

Factors supporting the pick

Starting-pitcher edge

St. Louis Cardinals has the lower ERA in the projected matchup (3.86).

Offensive production

Los Angeles Dodgers enters with the higher season OPS of the two teams.

Recent form

Los Angeles Dodgers has more wins over its last ten games.

Risks

Risks before the game

Expected lineup

The model uses the most recent official order, excluding players currently on the IL. It will recalculate when MLB posts today's lineup.

Player availability

10 injury reports should be monitored before first pitch.

Availability

Received injury reports

St. Louis Cardinals

  • Andre Pallante: Injured 15-Day
  • Blaze Jordan: Injured 10-Day
  • Everson Pereira: Injured 10-Day
  • Hunter Dobbins: Injured 15-Day
  • JJ Wetherholt: Injured 10-Day

Los Angeles Dodgers

  • Andy Pages: Injured 10-Day
  • Ben Casparius: Injured 60-Day
  • Blake Treinen: Injured 60-Day
  • Bobby Miller: Injured 60-Day
  • Brusdar Graterol: Injured 60-Day

MLB lineups

Batting orders pending

This section will update automatically when MLB publishes both lineups.

St. Louis Cardinals

  1. 1Joshua BáezPH
  2. 2Iván HerreraC
  3. 3Alec Burleson1B
  4. 4Jordan WalkerRF
  5. 5Nolan GormanDH
  6. 6José Fermín2B
  7. 7Nathan ChurchCF
  8. 8Ramón Urías3B
  9. 9Thomas SaggeseSS

Los Angeles Dodgers

  1. 1Shohei OhtaniDH
  2. 2Tommy Edman2B
  3. 3Mookie BettsSS
  4. 4Freddie Freeman1B
  5. 5Teoscar HernándezLF
  6. 6Max Muncy3B
  7. 7Kyle TuckerRF
  8. 8Enrique HernándezCF
  9. 9Ben RortvedtC

Transparency

Data quality and provenance

Available

Starters, Starter statistics, Recent form, Odds, Injuries, Handedness splits, Bullpens, Lineups

Missing

Weather

Sources

MLB Stats API · MLB Gameday · MLB roster oficial · Cuotas: DraftKings · Athletiq prediction model